Maria Timofeeva vs Madison Sieg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Jul at 04:05 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Timofeeva vs M. Sieg

 UZB
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Timofeeva 1 - 0 Sieg
They have played 2 sets in total, with Maria Timofeeva winning 2 and Madison Sieg winning 0. The last match between Maria Timofeeva and Madison Sieg was at the W50 Aschaffenburg, 10-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Maria Timofeeva getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Timofeeva | 1 | 
| Sieg | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W50 Aschaffenburg(07-10-25)
M. Timofeeva vs M. Sieg H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $590,772 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 62.42% (201-121) | Career Total W/L | 53.13% (119-105) | 
| 1 | Clay | 0 | 
| 8 | Titles | 2 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 20.00% (1-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
M. Timofeeva vs M. Sieg Match Preview:
- Sieg's second serve has had a slightly better success rate recently, winning 40.07% of points compared to Timofeeva's 37.79%, which is an important aspect in predicting match outcomes.
 - How do the players compare in return games? Timofeeva edges out Sieg by winning 51.56% to 49.22% of their opponents' second serve points, suggesting a stronger ability to break serve.
 - Both players have similar performance in returning first serves, with Timofeeva having a marginal advantage, 35.61% against Sieg's 35.21%.
 - Under pressure, Sieg has been able to save slightly more breakpoints (45.9%) than Timofeeva (44.79%), indicating a better resilience.
 - Looking at overall match performance in the past year, Timofeeva has a higher win rate at 50.94% compared to Sieg's 45.1%.
 - Considering surface preferences, Timofeeva excels on Hard courts with a 67% win rate, whereas Sieg's strongest surface is indoor-hards at 55%.
 - The level of competition each player has faced differs, with Timofeeva playing against higher-ranked opponents, averaging 288.62 compared to Sieg's 391.37.
 - Sieg performs better in deciding sets, winning 50% of them, compared to Timofeeva's 36%. This could be crucial if the match reaches a final set.
 - Timofeeva converts breakpoints more effectively, with a 44.95% success rate, while Sieg converts at 40.35%, making Timofeeva more efficient in pivotal moments.
 
Editorial Prediction (July 10, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Sieg and Timofeeva presents an intriguing contest. Sieg has shown a slight advantage in second serve performance and saves more breakpoints under pressure.
However, Timofeeva has been more consistent in capitalizing on return opportunities and competing against higher-ranked opponents, indicating her experience at tougher levels.
The deciding set performance favors Sieg, which may be crucial if the match extends to the final stages. Yet, Timofeeva's stronger return game and breakpoint conversion suggest she could have the upper hand in crucial points.
Considering these factors, Timofeeva is slightly favored to win this match due to her consistent performance in key areas and experience playing against tougher competition.
Maria Timofeeva vs Madison Sieg Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Timofeeva vs M. Sieg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 12 | Games Won | 6 | 
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 | 
| 1:38:50 | Average Match Time | 1:38:50 | 
| 73% (47/64) | 1st Serve % | 65% (41/63) | 
| 62% (29/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (18/41) | 
| 53% (9/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (10/22) | 
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) | 
| 56% (35/63) | Return Points Win % | 41% (26/64) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
M. Timofeeva Recent Matches Played
M. Sieg Recent Matches Played

M. Timofeeva vs M. Sieg Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.42% (201/121) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.13% (119/105) | 
| 61.46% (445/279) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.38% (260/246) | 
| 55.14% (3631/2954) | Games Win/Loss | 50.36% (2289/2256) | 
| 67.84% (116/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.17% (67/59) | 
| 59.80% (61/41) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.25% (41/36) | 
| 53.33% (24/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.38% (11/10) | 
| 0.00% (0/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 | 
| 360 | Aces Total | 253 | 
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 | 
| 1124 | Total Double Faults | 767 | 
| 1:38:59 | Average Match Time | 1:43:8 | 
| 435.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 452.69 | 
| 66% (13424/20336) | 1st Serve % | 63% (8653/13811) | 
| 60% (8090/13424) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (5127/8653) | 
| 45% (3120/6912) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2316/5158) | 
| 50% (1459/2904) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (882/1821) | 
| 49% (10241/20995) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6541/14144) | 
| 52.63% (10/9) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 36.36% (4/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 48.28% (14/15) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) | 
| 63.73% (130/74) | Challenger W/L | 51.05% (97/93) | 
| 72.88% (43/16) | Futures W/L | 68.75% (22/10) | 
| 63% (199/317) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (116/219) | 
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) | 
| 52% (36/69) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (19/34) | 
| 47% (39/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (36/59) | 
| 89% (202/179) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (113/101) | 
| 11% (202/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (113/12) | 
| 18% (120/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (111/18) |